Psellos wrote to five friends in central Anatolia to reconcile the bishop of Gordiason with the bishop of Matiane

Summary:
Psellos wrote to five friends in central Anatolia, most of them with with the army of Romanos IV, asking them to reconcile his friend the bishop of Gordiason with the bishop of Matiane. The first, a krites, was responsible for introducing Psellos to the bishop. Neither the latter nor Psellos blamed the krites for the dispute. Both sought a compromise, which Psellos would arbitrate. Psellos welcomed the krites' gift, though no lover of food. The second was Aristenos, whose claims of friendship (Psellos said) brought no letters, though Psellos asked travellers for messages from him. Yet if Aristenos freed the bishop of Gordiason from his problems and then wrote, Psellos' frowns would disappear. The third was the epi ton deeseon, who was going where Psellos could not trap him, just chase him with letters. He was asked for aid for Psellos' friend the bishop, who needed it. The letter ended with a verbal game over willingness and ability to help. The fourth was Basileios, the epi tou kanikleiou, who (Psellos feared) might change, living brilliantly near Romanos IV. He did not write, and Psellos had no access to Romanos till disfavour ceased. To win Psellos' undying affection, Basileios was to reconcile the two bishops. The fifth was Eustratios Choirosphaktes, who would (Psellos knew) lamely excuse his failure to write by claiming to prefer speech. He should write simply to Psellos, who loved simple letters. Psellos' friend the bishop of Gordiason was under attack by the bishop of Matiane; Eustratios should reconcile them  
Dates:
1068 
krites, acquaintance of Michael Psellos (Anonymus 2251)
  • Through him, Michael 61 had befriended Anonymus 2252; neither the latter nor Psellos blamed the krites for the dispute: both sought a compromise, which Psellos would arbitrate; Psellos welcomed his gift, though no lover of food (:) Psellos Letters (Sathas) 131.376-377
bishop of Gordiason (Anonymus 2252)
  • He needed to be reconciled to Anonymus 2464: Michael 61 sent a request for the purpose to Basileios 2103 (:) Psellos Letters (K - D) 146, 172.25-173.8
  • He needed help: Michael 61 sent a request for the purpose to Anonymus 2302 (:) Psellos Letters (K - D) 149, 174.18-22
  • He needed to be freed from problems: Michael 61 sent a request for the purpose to Anonymus 2300 (:) Psellos Letters (K - D) 148, 174.8-14
  • He had been befriended by Michael 61 via Anonymus 2251; neither he (the bishop) nor Psellos blamed the krites for the dispute: both sought a compromise, which Psellos would arbitrate (:) Psellos Letters (Sathas) 131.376-377
  • He needed to be reconciled to Anonymus 2464: Michael 61 sent a request for the purpose to Eustratios 101 (:) Psellos Letters (K - D) 147, 173.19-22
Aristenos, protoasekretis (Anonymus 2300)
  • His claims of friendship (Michael 61 complained) brought no letters; Psellos asked travellers about messages from him, but never found one; yet if Aristenos freed Anonymus 2252 from problems and then wrote, Psellos’ frowns would disappear (:) Psellos Letters (K - D) 148, 173.23-174.14
epi ton deeseon, correspondent of Michael Psellos (Anonymus 2302)
  • He was going where Psellos could not trap him, just chase him with letters; he was asked for aid for Anonymus 2252, who was Psellos’ friend and now needed help; the letter ended with a verbal game over willingness and ability to help (:) Psellos Letters (K - D) 149, 174.15-29
bishop of Matiane (Anonymus 2464)
Basileios, epi tou kanikleiou (Basileios 2103)
  • He was a charming person [...] of sweet tongue, sharp mind and genuine friendship: would he change? καλλίστη καὶ γλυκεῖα ψυχή [...] ὁ τὴν γλῶτταν ἡδύς, ὁ τὴν γνώμην ὀξύς, ὁ ἀληθὴς τὴν φιλίαν Psellos Letters (K - D) 146, 171.20-22
  • Psellos wondered if he would change, living brilliantly near Romanos 4; he did not write, and Psellos had no access to Romanos till disfavour ceased; Basileios was to reconcile Anonymus 2252 to Anonymus 2464, to win Psellos’ permanent affection (:) Psellos Letters (K - D) 146, 171.19-173.8
Eustratios Choirosphaktes, killed at Mantzikert (Eustratios 101)
  • He would lamely excuse his failure to write by claiming to prefer speech; he should write simply to Psellos, who loved such letters; Psellos’ friend Anonymus 2252 was under attack by Anonymus 2464; Eustratios should reconcile them (:) Psellos Letters (K - D) 147, 173.9-22
Michael Psellos (named Konstantinos till tonsure in 1054) (Michael 61)
  • Would Basileios 2103 change, living brilliantly near Romanos 4? he did not write, and Psellos had no access to Romanos till disfavour ceased; he asked Basileios to reconcile Anonymus 2252 to Anonymus 2464, to win Psellos’ permanent affection (:) Psellos Letters (K - D) 146, 171.19-173.8
  • He wrote to Basileios 2103, away near Romanos 4, asking help for Anonymus 2252 Psellos Letters (K - D) 146, 171.19-173.8
  • He complained that Anonymus 2300’s claims of friendship brought no letters; he asked travellers about a message from him, but was always disappointed; yet if he freed Anonymus 2252 from problems and then wrote, Psellos’ frowns would disappear (:) Psellos Letters (K - D) 148, 173.23-174.14
  • He wrote to Eustratios 101 seeking help for Anonymus 2252 Psellos Letters (K - D) 147, 173.9-22
  • He wrote to Anonymus 2251, through whom he had befriended Anonymus 2252; neither the latter nor Psellos blamed the krites for the dispute: both sought a compromise, which Psellos would arbitrate; he welcomed the gift, though no lover of food (:) Psellos Letters (Sathas) 131.376-377
  • He asked Anonymus 2302 for aid for Anonymus 2252 Psellos Letters (K - D) 149, 174.15-29
  • Eustratios 101 would lamely excuse his failure to write by claiming to prefer speech; he should write simply to Psellos, who loved such letters; his friend Anonymus 2252 was under attack by Anonymus 2464; Eustratios should reconcile them (:) Psellos Letters (K - D) 147, 173.9-22
  • He wrote to Anonymus 2251, seeking to mediate his dispute with Anonymus 2252 Psellos Letters (Sathas) 131.376-377
  • Anonymus 2302 was going where Psellos could not trap him, just chase him with letters; he requested aid for Anonymus 2252, who was Psellos’ friend and now needed help; the letter ended with a verbal game over willingness and ability to help (:) Psellos Letters (K - D) 149, 174.15-29
Emperor Romanos IV Diogenes (Romanos 4)
  • Romanos 4 was away, taking Basileios 2103, leaving Psellos with no access to him and in disfavour (:) Psellos Letters (K - D) 146, 171.19-173.8