Louis VII at Ratisbon & the Byzantine ambassadors

Summary:
Relieved by the departure of Conrad III, Manuel and the Byzantines now had to deal with Louis VII of France. Manuel sent Michael Palaiologos and Michael Branas to greet Louis as he crossed the Danube. They reached Ratisbon, where they had to wait several days before the arrival of a crusader delegation sent from Worms, consisting of Alvisus, archbishop of Arras, Leo, abbot of St Bertin and Batholomew the chancellor. Louis himself attived later. The French (in Odo of Deuil) claim to have met two ambassadors, Demetrios and Mauros. They brought letters beginning with flattering verbiage which offended Godfrey of Langres. They made two demands for the passage of the crusaders, first that they not capture any town belonging to the Byzantines, second that they freely restore to the emperor any place they captured which had recently belonged to him. The council of Louis VII assented to the first, but not to the second, with seemed unfair in not recognising their efforts and imprecise in the absence of geographical definitions. Delays led to menaces that Manuel might destroy all the food collected and threaten the crusade with starvation. The crisis of the second issue was glossed over by more general mutual guarantees, and postponed for discussion in Constantinople. The Byzantine ambassadors were reported (by Kinnamos) to have been welcomed by the king with gratitude and without excessive pride. At the end of negotiations (according to Odo), Demetrios disappeared abruptly, but Mauros stayed to conduct a French embassy to the capital 
Dates:
1147 
Alvisus, archbishop of Arras (Alvisus 101)
Byzantine ambassadors who met Louis VII at the Danube (Anonymi 206)
  • They brought letters (according to Odo 102) beginning with insufferable verbiage (especially to Godfrey 101) but ending in two demands: the crusaders should not take any place from Byzantium, and should return to the emperor any place they took which formerly belonged to the empire (:) Odo of Deuil 26
  • Their first stipulation was accepted by the French, but not the second: it ignored their efforts, and was imprecise, without geographical definition; delays led to menaces that Manuel might destroy all the food collected and threaten the crusade with starvation; the issue was finally put off till Constantinople (:) Odo of Deuil 28
Bartholomew, chancellor of Louis VII (Bartholomaios 116)
  • From Worms he was sent on by Louis 101, with Alvisus 101 and Leon 227, to Ratisbon (Regensburg) on the Danube, where the envoys of Manuel 1 had been waiting for some days (:) Odo of Deuil 24
Demetrios, envoy to Louis VII at Ratisbon (Demetrios 178)
  • He left abruptly after discussing Manuel 1's business with Louis 101 at Ratisbon, leaving behind his colleague Mauros 107; Mauros was to conduct Louis' representatives to Constantinople (:) Odo of Deuil 28
Leo, abbot of St Bertin (Leon 227)
Louis VII, king of France (Louis 101)
  • At the Danube he welcomed Manuel 1's representatives, Michael 62 (Palaiologos) and Michael 17002 (Branas); he did not harm the Byzantines as he passed, unlike Conrad 53; approaching Constantinople, he sent to offer full cooperation (:) Kinnamos 82.5-17
  • He left Worms for Ratisbon, where Manuel 1's ambassadors had already been waiting for some days; he sent on Alvisus 101, Bartholomaios 116 and Leon 227 to meet them, then arrived himself in Ratisbon, where he was well received (:) Odo of Deuil 24
  • He was able to cross the Danube by a fine bridge, and to use a substantial fleet, which took the crusaders' baggage as far as Bulgaria; they used the opportunity to include several two-and four-horse carts, which later proved more trouble than they were worth (advice for later pilgrims) (:) Odo of Deuil 24
  • He received letters from the Byzantine ambassadors beginning with verbiage insufferable to all (especially Godfrey 101) but ending in two demands: the crusaders should not take any place from Byzantium, and should return to the emperor any place they took which formerly belonged to the empire (:) Odo of Deuil 24-28
  • He and his council found the first point reasonable, and were willing to swear to it, but not the second: it seemed unfair that the emperor should reap the fruit of their labour, and imprecise, without geographical definitions: this nearly caused a crisis, but was glossed over by general mutual guarantees and put off till Constantinople (:) Odo of Deuil 26-28
Emperor Manuel I Komnenos (Manuel 1)
  • Sent Michael 62 (Palaiologos) and Michael 17002 (Branas) to Louis VII of France (Anonymus 170021) near the Danube; he later welcomed him to the city and palace, seating him on a low sellion near his throne, and took him to Blachernai (:) Kinnamos 82.5-83.14
  • He and the Byzantines regarded the passing of Conrad 53 as a blessing; he again provided food for the French, but stationed troops to attack them, and may have colluded in local fraud, taking prepayment and providing little food, or none, or even poisoning it (:) Niketas Choniates, Historia 66.10-67.40
Mauros, envoy to Louis VII at Ratisbon (Mauros 107)
  • At the end of the negotiations with Louis 101, while his colleague Demetrios 178 left abruptly, he remained; he was to conduct Louis' envoys to Constantinople (:)
Michael Palaiologos, commander in Italy under Manuel I (Michael 62)
  • Was sent as an envoy of the emperor Manuel 1 to Louis VII of France, just after the latter crossed the Danube; was welcomed with gratitude and without excessive pride: in association with Michael 17002 (:) Kinnamos 82.8-11
Michael Branas, strategos of Cilicia (Michael 17002)
  • Was sent as an envoy of the emperor Manuel 1 to Louis VII of France, just after the latter crossed the Danube; was welcomed with gratitude and without excessive pride: in association with Michael 62 (:) Kinnamos 82.8-11