A case of forgery in the signature of a report on the bishop of Korone

Summary:
Psellos wrote to the krites of Katotika, asking for help for bishop of Korone, long absent from his see, to stop the theft of its estates. A notarios of the logothetes Nikephoritzes had forged the latter's signature to a report against the bishop. The forgery had been detected by Psellos, who had warned the then krites of Katotika and probably his successor, the current krites, to avoid deception. The forgery now seemed to have been admitted 
Dates:
1074 (Uncertain) 
bishop of Korone (Anonymus 2256)
  • He had long been absent from his see, and a letter was written by Michael 61 to Anonymus 2257, asking for help to stop the theft of its estates; the signature of a report against the bishop had been forged by Anonymus 2259 (:) Psellos Letters (Sathas) 134.378
krites of Katotika (Anonymus 2257)
krites of Katotika (Anonymus 2258)
notarios of the logothetes (of the dromos) (Anonymus 2259)
Michael Psellos (named Konstantinos till tonsure in 1054) (Michael 61)
  • He wrote to Anonymus 2257, asking for help for Anonymus 2256, long absent from his see, to stop the theft of its estates; Anonymus 2259, notarios of Nikephoros 63, had forged the latterÂ’s signature to a report against the bishop (:) Psellos Letters (Sathas) 134.378
  • He detected the forgery of the report of Anonymus 2259 (now, it was said, admitted) and had reported it to Anonymus 2258, predecessor of Anonymus 2257, and probably to the latter too, so that they should not be deceived (:) Psellos Letters (Sathas) 134.378
  • He wrote to Anonymus 2257, asking for help for Anonymus 2256 Psellos Letters (Sathas) 134.378
Nikephoritzes (Nikephoros 63)